To talk about sustainability in the steel industry is not an easy task, as the perception of value can change quite a lot depending on which side of the supply chain one is on. The three main pillars of sustainability are society, environment, and economy; and the impact generated by the steel making process affects all of them. This is why the industry has been under scrutiny over the last few years, and technological developments will be needed to increase the quality of steel making processes, therefore increasing quality of life in the world for future generations.
By Caio Pisano, Technical Market Development Manager, CBMM | Niobium
According to a report published in April 2022, by the Global Efficiency Intelligence, the iron and steel industry accounts for around 7% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and 11% of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. These numbers are indeed concerning, nevertheless, the solution to a more circular and sustainable economy can come from within this very industry. This article is intended to bring some insights on how to get there; a small spoiler – stainless steel will play a major role in this strategy.
The industry has been adapting itself quite fast on the consolidation of fundamental concepts of sustainability and this adaptation process will be crucial for the proper evaluation of the supply chain as a whole, considering the TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) of solutions versus a short-term cost analysis will also be a crucial paradigm shift, that will enable the usage of more adequate materials to already consolidate solutions.
Longevity of Solutions
Following this cost perspective, one could give many examples and consider many different aspects, but this article will focus on two: longevity of solutions, and technical performance of materials. On longevity of solutions, there are many studies conducted by public and independent agencies showing that the global cost of corrosion in the world is between 2% and 4% of the global GDP, representing trillions of USD losses among the supply chain over the years.
The development of higher corrosion resistance stainless steels is an interesting alternative to that, materials such as duplex stainless steels, super austenitic stainless steels, and super ferritic stainless steels are solutions that require less, or no maintenance when compared to coated carbon steels or other grades in many applications. Even within these stainless steel families, it is worth noting that many solutions are still relying on the usage of ‘status-quo’ grades, such as AISI 304 or AISI 316L, however ferritic stainless steels, such as AISI 444 and AISI 445, are interesting alternatives with lower costs. Being in a World Cup year, one example where ferritic stainless steels are successfully being used in architecture is the Allianz Stadium in Brazil, where the facade was produced with AISI 444.
Technical Performance of Materials
The other concept is the technical performance of materials, and the metallurgical development of stainless steel. This direction will be the core target of this article. Once the industry manages to combine the development of higher strength, higher corrosion resistance, and higher temperature performance grades with cost efficiency, the TCO of solutions will become more and more positive. That is why the consideration of ferritic stainless steel can be one of the ways to achieve this. Another important strategy is to invite the end users to be part of the development process and projects, as they can give the guidelines and targets of development, mitigating risks and reducing time to market.
Diving deeper on this topic, an interesting approach to improve the technical performance of stainless steels is the combination of proper alloying strategy with the best practices in the steel shop. One example is the usage of stabilizing elements, such as Niobium (Nb), as an alternative to the classical production routes with Batch Annealing’s (BAF). As it is well known, the production of non-stabilized ferritic grades can lead to the generation of martensite in the hot rolling process, which later will require long annealing processes, consuming a substantial amount of energy, time, and money, and generating a lot of emissions. Once Niobium (Nb) is added, or other stabilizing elements, to these ferritic grades (AISI 430, for example), martensite will no longer be formed in the hot rolling process, and therefore it is possible to optimize the production route, reducing annealing time and the carbon footprint per ton of steel. This is an interesting way of looking at technical developments, with sustainability as a target!
From the Application Perspective
On the application perspective there are also many different directions to explore. It is important to emphasize the development of solutions for the production and consumption of green hydrogen. Within the many technologies available, one with the highest yield is solid oxide electrochemical cells, electrolyzers, or fuel cells that operate in very high temperatures, in the range between 600°C and 1,000°C. The development of ferritic grades with the proper performance for this application, proper cost competitivity, and most importantly proper carbon footprint, will be an important enabler of this technology. Once again, combining the strategy of alloy design with production process development is crucial.
Considering the structural components segment, an important milestone for the stainless steel industry is to succeed on the development of higher strength and cost-effective grades, as alternatives to the classic coated carbon steels. This challenge can be met once again with the combination of alloying strategy and process optimization, where the usage of some alloying elements, such as Niobium (Nb), can promote the development of strengthening mechanisms (i.e grain refinement and precipitation). Together with a more appropriate homogeneity of the microstructure, this leads to a better toughness, and therefore a better applicability of these materials as alternatives to the status-quo materials.
From the sustainability perspective, the development of these alternatives with stainless steels bring benefits from the beginning. Right away it will be possible to promote a better corrosion performance, and less stress and costs related to maintenance. Additionally, it will be possible to promote better circularity of the solution, as stainless steel is 100% recyclable, and in the end of the lifetime of these components, they can be remelted without losing any performance in the manufacturing process.
Conclusion
All things considered, the discussion about sustainability in the steel business is quite extensive and unfortunately it cannot be restrained to a single article; the main players in the supply chain are working hard to achieve targets, however there are no magic solutions available for short-term results. The development of high-performance stainless steels will be one of the many enablers of a more sustainable and healthy future. One can be sure of only one thing – whatever direction the industry goes, stainless steel will be there!